[governance] Is 'tit for tat' all that can be accomplished?

[McTim]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:22 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 11 June 2013 06:24 PM, Kerry Brown wrote:
>
> The language is too confrontational (i.e. “notes with horror”). It will
> never be taken seriously.
>
>
> Taken seriously by whom? We are addressing it to the public in general, and
> people are dead serious horrified by what they are coming to know of.
>
> BTW, I took that expression 'horror' from Nick's email, and if you arent
> really horrified by what happened, I must say you are among the very few....
>
> In just one month of March 2013, 6.7 billion pieces of intelligence were
> picked up by the 'system' from India's computers and networks .... And you
> are saying that 'horror' is too strong a word!!

http://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/indias-big-brother-the-central-monitoring-system


So let's call out all gov'ts who are spying on us.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t