[governance] Fwd: [ NNSquad ] Internet Shattered: Spies, Spooks, and Disgust

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Sat Jun 8 21:03:09 EDT 2013


FYI, emphasis added is mine:


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren at vortex.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:00 PM
Subject: [ NNSquad ]  Internet Shattered: Spies, Spooks, and Disgust
To: nnsquad at nnsquad.org



             Internet Shattered: Spies, Spooks, and Disgust

               http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/001042.html


I've spent literally my entire adult life (and even before) working on
Internet technologies and policies, one way or another, reaching back
to early ARPANET days at UCLA -- a project rooted in Department of
Defense funding, it's worthwhile to remember.

Over that time, there have been many related high points and low
points, events joyful or upsetting, but never -- not even close --
have I felt so completely, utterly disgusted with a situation
associated with the Net as I am today.

The apparently true facts we're learning about our own government's
spying abuses against its own citizens are bad enough
( http://j.mp/13qeyu7 [Lauren's Blog] ).  But we also are faced with
stomaching the incredibly hypocritical and disingenuous pronouncements
of intelligence agencies, administration officials, and Congressional
leaders, as they point fingers back and forth about who knew what
when, who approved which program, and why we citizens shouldn't be at
all concerned.

*To make matters worse, mixed in with misinformation and purposeful
obfuscations, these actions have played directly into the hands of
conspiracy theorists who are now working overtime to damage the very
parties most in a position to help hold back unacceptable government
prying into our affairs.*

*It is in fact the major Web services providers like Google, Twitter,
Facebook, and others, who have become the most effective holding lines
against government overreaching.  Most smaller firms or individuals
don't have the financial or legal resources to fight back against
overly broad data demands and other government abuses.*

Thanks to the damage done by distorted dribbling of information over
the last few days about telephone metadata collection, PRISM, and now
new stories and government generated gobbledygook explanations just
today, people all over the world are confused and upset, wondering how
deeply the USA is spying on the Internet and its users, the telephone
system, and perhaps their supermarket loyalty cards.

Even though the major Web firms categorically denied providing "back
door" en masse data access to NSA, and accurately asserted that all
data requests are vetted by those firms (and sometimes pushed back
against in court), the last few days' worth of false charges have led
to a torrent of people flooding comments and postings (not to mention
my inbox).  Their rants proclaim that the firms are lying, they're in
bed with the government, this is proof you can't believe anything
these companies say, and gigabytes of other assorted paranoid rot.  I
won't even address these ravings here.  They generally demonstrate a
profound lack of knowledge regarding both global-scale software
engineering and the legal process.  They're illogical, irrational, and
are most appropriately filed in Area 51, right next to the outer space
aliens' rumpus room.

The government has been feeding this conspiratorial mindset against
these firms for years.  It has tried its best to scare the hell out
Internet users, by attempting to falsely convince them that cookies
are evil incarnate, open Wi-Fi access ports are somehow to be
considered private, and that anonymous ad personalization systems will
kill the family dog, if not your children.

All the while, we see now that the real abuses have been orchestrated
and planned from within the Beltway for many years, by officials
totally convinced that they are so much smarter, so much more worldly,
so much more entitled than the rest of us, that they've evolved the
art of political and bureaucratic hypocrisy and insanely exaggerated
secrecy to a level unimagined by the most skillful con men and
swindlers in history.

In this case, we're not just being swindled out of uncountable
hundreds of billions of dollars being sucked into black budget
"everything is called terrorism now!" ratholes, but we've been cheated
by the politicians, spooks, and spies out of something even more
important in the long run -- trust.

No matter how ostensibly laudable their motives, these officials and
minions with their vast and secretive funding, are steadfast in their
belief that the American people cannot be trusted -- after all, we're
just the little people compared with the giant brains of Congress and
the intelligence agencies.  Pat us on the head, tell us some scary
stories (leave out the inconvenient details of course), and scoot us
all back to our rooms.

Now hear this!

We're on to you.  Not just here in the U.S. but other governments
around the world who are playing the same games with their citizens.
We don't need any wacky conspiracy theories -- the facts that are
demonstrable are sufficient.

We know that you desperately fear an Internet that you can't control,
where every byte of data and every activity log isn't unencrypted and
available at your immediate beck and call.

We know you want to control what sites are available and what sites
say, dictate the results search engines may show, and generally treat
the Net as your own global intelligence fetish supreme.

How about this?  If you believe you can honestly make the case that
you need to know everyone we call on the phone, have access on demand
to virtually everything we do on our computers, and otherwise treat us
with such suffocatingly, "loving" contempt -- get out here and
convince us.

No more hiding behind vast secrecy that serves your own desire for
agency empire building far more than actual national security needs.
No more smoke screens blown at Congress pressuring them to approve your
schemes without details or debate on the theory that they're just too
secret for Congress to really trouble itself about.

And enough of trying to turn us against the very Internet firms that
have the ethical and legal stamina not to let us be flattened like
worms under your national security steamroller.

While we're at it, oh spies, spooks, and affiliated politicos, one
other piece of free advice.

Go grab or download yourself a copy of the Constitution of the United
States.  It's widely available, at least for the moment.  Pay
particular attention to the Bill of Rights.

Take it home.  Discuss it with your spouse and children -- your
children in particular probably already understand it far better than
you do.

Those documents were written by a bunch of rather ordinary men of
extraordinary vision and resolve.  They knew that even a well-meaning
government can easily descend into abuse and tyranny, and they knew
that protecting fundamental rights requires not treating everyone as a
potential suspect, or everything they do or say as subject to access
and analysis by the King's representatives and sycophants.

They knew what freedom meant, while your actions now -- regardless of
your motives -- are treating their efforts with vast contempt.

We are proud to be Americans, but we are also enormously saddened and
disgusted by your behavior.

And that's the truth.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein (lauren at vortex.com): http://www.vortex.com/lauren
Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility:
http://www.pfir.org/pfir-info
Founder:
 - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org
 - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
 - Data Wisdom Explorers League: http://www.dwel.org
 - Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance:
http://www.gctip.org
Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
Google+: http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter: http://vortex.com/t-lauren
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com
_______________________________________________
nnsquad mailing list
http://lists.nnsquad.org/mailman/listinfo/nnsquad


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130608/147a19d2/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list