[governance] IGF Cancelled

Deirdre Williams williams.deirdre at gmail.com
Fri Jul 26 11:50:22 EDT 2013


However - weighing in with Jeremy  and Ginger - I don't see that having the
meeting online would necessarily preclude the attendance of governments?
Deirdre



On 26 July 2013 11:37, David Allen <David_Allen_AB63 at post.harvard.edu>wrote:

> The desire to 'go independent' is always understandable.
>
> However.
>
> A, if not the, IGF challenge has been to get serious engagement by
> governments, and most all governments.  Since governments hold the power,
> such engagement is fundamental - without it, IGF is effectively window
> dressing on the policy process.
>
> To 'go independent' virtually assures no prospect for serious,
> more-or-less across the board, government engagement.  So no 'multi' in the
> multi-stakeholder.  At least not that - essential - multi.
>
> Said with - nonetheless - full appreciation for all that Jeremy and Ginger
> bring to the work.
>
> David
>
>
> On Jul 26, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Ginger Paque wrote:
>
> Jeremy said:
> Alternatively it could be time for the IGF to be reimagined in purely
> online form.  At least that would ensure that more attention is given to
> the remote participation experience.
>
> YES, Jeremy: it's time! I suggested this in today's MAG meeting, but there
> was not time to address the possibility. I do hope it is given serious
> consideration.
>
> gp
>
> Ginger (Virginia) Paque
> IG Programmes, DiploFoundation
>
> *The latest from Diplo...* *Upcoming online courses in Internet
> governance: Master in Contemporary Diplomacy with Internet Governance
> specialisation, Critical Internet Resources and Infrastructure, ICT Policy
> and Strategic Planning, and Privacy and Personal Data Protection. Read
> more and apply at http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses*
>  **
> **
>
>
> On 25 July 2013 22:44, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:
>
>>  On 26/07/13 11:37, genekimmelman at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I imagine other governments that really want the event to proceed will
>> now weigh in to help
>>
>>
>> If not, then it will really confirm the contempt with which the IGF is
>> held as a process.  There are Silicon Valley parties that have cost more
>> than the IGF's $1.05M shortfall.
>>
>> Alternatively it could be time for the IGF to be reimagined in purely
>> online form.  At least that would ensure that more attention is given to
>> the remote participation experience.
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
>> Senior Policy Officer
>> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers*
>> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
>> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
>> Malaysia
>> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>>
>> Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement knowledge
>> hub | http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone
>>
>> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org |
>> www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
>>
>> Read our email confidentiality notice<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>.
>> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>


-- 
“The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130726/48edf9f6/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list