[governance] Facebook spent $4 million to lobby U.S. lawmakers in 2012

michael gurstein gurstein at gmail.com
Sat Jan 26 15:54:14 EST 2013 

Well, I thought that was in part what we were supposed to be doing i.e. helping to define what is meant by the global public interest in the context of Internet governance.

One thing I do know, is that it does not include signing on to documents that as currently formulated are effectively exclusive of at least 4/5ths of the global population such as the document that I just commented on.

M

-----Original Message-----
From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 9:53 AM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; michael gurstein
Cc: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
Subject: Re: [governance] Facebook spent $4 million to lobby U.S. lawmakers in 2012

Do we have a definition of global public interest?

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:47 PM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> These continuing sniggering comments concerning "world peace" are to 
> my mind unbecoming…
>
>
>
> And in fact, without using those exact terms (did anyone in fact, 
> directly refer to "world peace") issues of the governing the Internet 
> in the global public interest (or not) are very very much issues of 
> concern to this group and if anyone questions whether they are 
> directly pertinent to our immediate discussion I would refer you to my 
> comments on the document that Stephane and Avri have just now circulated for sign-on to the IGC.
>
>
>
> M
>
>
>
> From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org
> [mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of Dr. 
> Alejandro Pisanty Baruch
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 9:23 AM
> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Nick Ashton-Hart; Guru गुरु
> Subject: RE: [governance] Facebook spent $4 million to lobby U.S. 
> lawmakers in 2012
>
>
>
> Nick,
>
>
>
> "Folks, is tax policy really what people are interested in having an 
> effect on in the IGC list? Is this a battle you really want to enter 
> into, given the very real threats the open Internet faces today?"
>
>
>
> And world peace.
>
>
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
>
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Facultad de Química UNAM
>
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>
>
>
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
>
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn,
> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
> ________________________________
>
> Desde: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org
> [governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] en nombre de Nick Ashton-Hart 
> [nashton at ccianet.org] Enviado el: sábado, 26 de enero de 2013 02:35
> Hasta: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Guru गुरु
> Asunto: Re: [governance] Facebook spent $4 million to lobby U.S. 
> lawmakers in 2012
>
> Guru said:
>
>
>
> The scandalously low effective tax rates of the IT transnationals can 
> also be seen as some kind of implicit subsidy ... and 
> measures/experiments like that of the French Govt are required to help 
> correct this situation - by reducing the lobbying power of these 
> corporates and also getting the funding required by governments to 
> support basic societal infrastructure, including soft infrastructure like public education and public health..
>
>
>
> My reply:
>
>
>
> The rates being paid by IT companies are not different than other 
> types of companies. For example, I believe GE paid effectively 14% tax 
> globally last year. Corporate tax rates overall do not differentiate 
> by sector - though, of course, some vertical markets do get exemptions 
> and credits designed to encourage certain activities by them.
>
>
>
> If you believe that companies should pay more, that's fine - but to 
> suggest that IT companies are particularly bad in some way does a 
> disservice, I think, to the overall objective which many seek: 
> reforming the tax system so that companies, in general, pay a larger share of tax.
>
>
>
> This is, by the way, extremely complex and there are powerful 
> incentives for countries to incentivise FDI by, among other measures, 
> favourable tax regimes. It will be incredibly difficult to get enough 
> countries that are desirable markets for industry to sign up to a 
> broad range of measures to synchronise taxes to produce the desired 
> end - the incentives to attract FDI are simply very powerful.
>
>
>
> What the French are proposing (not for the first time) is not going to 
> help anything; it is soapbox policy, designed for an internal audience 
> of French people. Like the 75% tax on wealthy individuals they 
> propose, it wouldn't raise enough money to solve France's real deficit 
> issues; it would just make France even less competitive an economy than it already is.
>
>
>
> Folks, is tax policy really what people are interested in having an 
> effect on in the IGC list? Is this a battle you really want to enter 
> into, given the very real threats the open Internet faces today?
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Nick Ashton-Hart
>
>
>
> Need to meet with me? Schedule the time that suits us both here:
> http://meetme.so/nashton
>
>
>
> Sent from my one of my handheld thingies, please excuse linguistic mangling.
>
>
> On 26 Jan 2013, at 04:49, "Guru गुरु" <Guru at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
> The scandalously low effective tax rates of the IT transnationals can 
> also be seen as some kind of implicit subsidy ... and 
> measures/experiments like that of the French Govt are required to help 
> correct this situation - by reducing the lobbying power of these 
> corporates and also getting the funding required by governments to 
> support basic societal infrastructure, including soft infrastructure like public education and public health..
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>



--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

More information about the Governance mailing list