[governance] today's Wash Post editorial

[parminder]

On Friday 25 January 2013 08:48 PM, McTim wrote:
> <snip>
> right, clear that hurdle, then convince ICANN to violate the contract
> that gives them their raison d'être and I am on board!

The whole point of what I am proposing is that ICANN raison d'etre must 
be its bottom up global legitimacy, and not the contract with the US 
gov... And ICANN has to take a stand on favour of one against the other 
possible raison d'etre. There is an obvious tension between the two, and 
my proposal invites us, and finally the ICANN, to take a clear stand on  
what ICANN's raison d'etre really is.

It is however intersting to note that you seem to consider the US 
contract being ICANN's raison d'etre rather than its bottom up global 
legitimacy.

parminder
>


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t