[governance] today's Wash Post editorial

[McTim]

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:35 AM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
> Parminder,
>
> On Jan 25, 2013, at 3:10 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>> ICANN simply communicates the root change decision simultaneously to all the 13 root servers, and also designates a specific time period in which the root change exercise should be done.
>
> Ignoring everything else, I have some doubt that the current root server operators would be at all interested in taking on the role (and liabilities) you're proposing.

right, clear that hurdle, then convince ICANN to violate the contract
that gives them their raison d'être and I am on board!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t