[governance] Re: a formal appeal request to the appeal team to reverse the recent ban on a Member

[Tapani Tarvainen]

Ditto.

I would like to add that I wish the appeals committee would not
consider this as an either-or situation, but more fine-grained,
what kind of sanctions could and should be used in general and
what (if any) in this case in particular.

That is, things like how many warnings would be appropriate;
should warnings be public or private;
if someone is banned from a list, should it be
permanent or temporary and if the latter, how long;
could just temporary suspension of posting privileges work
(so they could read the list but not post anything themselves);
or could individual moderation be used.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

On Jan 09 21:13, Sivasubramanian M (isolatedn at gmail.com) wrote:

> I support the appeal request.
> 
> Sivasubramanian M
> On Jan 9, 2013 1:19 PM, "William Drake" <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:
> 
> > Me too
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > On Jan 8, 2013, at 22:57, George Sadowsky <george.sadowsky at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I support them also.
> >
> > On Jan 8, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Ivar A. M. Hartmann wrote:
> >
> > I support these grounds for appeal.
> >
> > Ivar
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:35 PM, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There was no "ad hominem" attack in the email that caused the
> >> complainant to complain.


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t