[governance] FW: [IP] Google's Lawyers Work Behind the Scenes to Carry the Day - NYTimes.com

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

It is built from your browsing history and you can definitely opt out of it.   As for the personalized search, is this supposed to be changing the actual news items, rather than showing one article in preference to another article, and various other articles below it .. and even more when you keep clicking?
 
I’m not particularly interested in what moveon.org has to say, to be honest.  My previous interactions with them have not left me with a very good impression.  (google suresh Ramasubramanian + moveon.org for some 8..9 year old history on IP / politechbot)
 
                suresh
 
From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of Guru ????
Sent: 07 January 2013 10:59
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: Re: [governance] FW: [IP] Google's Lawyers Work Behind the Scenes to Carry the Day - NYTimes.com
 
 
 
On 01/06/2013 10:22 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
So do you get all your news from just news.google.com <http://news.google.com>  and other google search results, instead of Facebook shares, Riaz gleefully posting every article he sees about google being investigated for, say, giggling in church?
 
And did Riaz find this news item anywhere other than google search?
 
And does this reality distortion field google is supposed to have actually hide any search results from you that are negative to it?  Like search for "google FTC" and you get the EU action, statements from Microsoft slamming the decision etc.

Does 'personalised search' (without your having asked for, it or having any role in such pesonalisation) not in a sense 'reality distortion' ....by offering different people different views on the same keyword search.

See attached aticle (the web link is not available anymore)

Guru 
 
And the last link on page 1 of the search results showing just where google got spanked by the FTC.  http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/111650/why-does-everyone-think-google-beat-the-ftc# <http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/111650/why-does-everyone-think-google-beat-the-ftc>  is worth a read as a kind f counterpoint to all the commentary about how google got a get out of jail card because of intensive lobbying.

Can we please
 
1. Have a reality check here
2. Go back to discussing Internet governance 

--srs (iPad)

On 06-Jan-2013, at 22:00, "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com <mailto:gurstein at gmail.com> > wrote:
Thanks Riaz (and sorry for the really awkward phrasing… 
 
To put that in English…
 
I'm wondering whether it wouldn't be better to "investigate" Google for possible "freedom of thought" violations rather than issues concerning "freedom of speech"… Google has the potential for much more serious impacts on our capacity to know (or not know) certain things, than on what we can say or not say…
 
M
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130107/b9c24f76/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t