[governance] Results of IGC Charter Amendment Poll

[shaila mistry]

There must be many members who would vote but may have missed the deadline. I must admit that whilst traveling it is pretty hard to unravel the exact email with the voting link and remember the deadline.  As a suggestion we could re send the voting email  a few times with appropriate "Jaago" in the subject matter. And with deadline !
Secondly  I m also wondering how many of our members are simply "dormant" members or even plain " Looky loos" ( those that just look on ) does this mean that we are to remain immobilised by their non voting, simply because we have a two third rule ? Which two thirds do we really count ? In a general election of course we only count those that voted. No account is taken of the non voters ? Imagine the chaos ensuing were this the case. So the question remains who are our true members and how many? 
Regards
Shaila 
Sent from I phone. Apologies !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130216/d4391c91/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t