[governance] Civil Society (was Re: caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting)

Suresh Ramasubramanian suresh at hserus.net
Sat Feb 16 09:38:31 EST 2013


Both resolve only to an IP address, which despite working party 19 
claims should not be considered personal data

--srs (htc one x)



On 16 February 2013 7:47:15 PM Roland Perry 
<roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote:
> In message
> <CALrvCLDiFxGBQW4ECHOY0W8y+sTc0uEHPDst=GN=kAx1Y5RLnQ at mail.gmail.com>, at
> 14:45:50 on Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> writes
> >> So some opposing views (within civil society, because both stalker and
> >> stalked are ordinary citizens and therefore members of civil society) have
> >> not yet been resolved.
> >
> >IMO the appropriate place for such conflicts between conflicting
> >legitimate concerns to be resolved is national parliaments and the
> >corresponding polititical processes.
>
> But some of the remedies can only be applied at a global level (eg
> traceability via WHOIS records, or from international "cloud" service
> providers).
> --
> Roland Perry
>



-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list