[governance] Part A Re: [] caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting

[McTim]

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>
>
> Ah, the wrath that descends on one who disagrees.  Like music to my ear
>
>
> On 13 Feb 2013, at 12:04, parminder wrote:
>
>> Now you do not want it implemented.
>
>
> false, I do not wish it to be imposed from outside the IGF on the IGF.
>
> I want the IGF to review and then implement as per the IGFs viewpoint.
>
> As far as I am concerned the job of the UN and its various organs is to initiate the IGF, not rule it.


+1 to all above!

>
>
>> Here you are subverting
>
> I am suggesting a different perspective.  Sorry times when a different perspective in the IGC is subversion.

The "civil society thought police" has found you lacking!

>
> I have long argued that NN is an overloaded term in which we all talk past each other.
>

+1


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t