[governance] caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting

[Nick Ashton-Hart]

+1 to the thought extracted below. Thanks Norbert for trying to herd
all the cats :)

-- 
Regards,

Nick
Sent from my one of my handheld thingies, please excuse linguistic mangling.

On 12 Feb 2013, at 20:20, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> I do not think that there's anything fundamentally wrong with the
> process that I've been trying to implement here, of having relatively
> informal online editing followed by a formal call, with a deadline, to
> raise any issues about the text that has resulted from the informal
> process, and then having a consensus-oriented process to resolve the
> issues that have been raised

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t