[governance] caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting

[parminder]

On Wednesday 13 February 2013 04:38 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Feel free to ignore anything I said based on my being late.
> It was only Parminder's note that reminded me I needed to do something.

So you do see that notes made on and to the list on such an important 
matters as developing a common IGC statement are rather useful, than 
just someone working in solitude typing ones ideas away on a editable 
webpage :)


>
> I am more than able to argue my points as an individual contributor.
> Now that I have thought it through, I can write something and submit it before the deadline.
>
> thanks
>
>
> avri
>
>
> On 12 Feb 2013, at 14:19, Norbert Bollow wrote:
>
>> Sigh. I had hoped that with the Feb 7 announcement of the Feb 10
>> internal deadline for raising new substantive issues / change requests,
>> we'd now be able to proceed in an orderly manner to "resolve the
>> comments", i.e. reach consensus on an acceptable path forward for
>> each of the issues raised in those comments.
>


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t