[governance] Fwd: [discuss] /1net Steering/Coordination Commitee

Fri Dec 20 10:05:03 EST 2013

Me propongo como voluntario, aquí en el Perú trato de que Internet sea
un derecho esencial de los pueblos, creo que ya es tiempo de dar mas
chance a la comunidad de técnicos de Latinoamérica y el Caribe...

Cordialmente:         José Félix Arias Ynche
                        Investigador Social Para El Desarrollo

2013/12/20 Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>:
> Thanks Adam.
>
> So we need some volunteers. Who is willing and able to take the time to
> serve in these capacities?
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
>
>
> Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> A request for civil society to provide names by the end of the year
>> (11 days) for two committees.  Carlos' email below, but quote:
>>
>> "2-3 names for the HL committee and 2 names for the exec committee
>> as, soon as possible (before this year ends)"
>>
>> These committees are described in the Brazilian Internet Steering
>> Committee's announcement of November 26
>> <http://www.nic.br/imprensa/releases/2013/rl-2013-62.htm> as:
>>
>> 1. High-Level Multistakeholder Committee: Responsible for conducting
>> the political articulation and fostering the involvement of the
>> international community. 2. Executive Multistakeholder Committee:
>> Responsible for organizing the event, including the agenda discussion
>> and execution, and for the treatment of the proposals from
>> participants and different stakeholders;
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> > From: "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca>
>> > Date: December 20, 2013 10:01:48 PM GMT+09:00
>> > To: Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>, Milton L Mueller
>> > <mueller at syr.edu> Cc: discuss at 1net.org
>> > Subject: Re: [discuss] /1net Steering/Coordination Commitee
>> >
>> > Hi people,
>> >
>> > Writing as a member of the local organizing group (LOG): we are
>> > extremely worried because time is an independent variable and we
>> > badly need a clear definition from all stakeholders as soon as
>> > possible.
>> >
>> > To CS: please forget about the other stakeholders (they have their
>> > own challenges and they will have to solve them). If CS is going to
>> > restart the infighting to define representing names, now on who
>> > will sit at the 1Net Steering Committee, instead of building upon
>> > the imperfect but reasonable process we managed to do so far, you
>> > will be pushing LOG into a corner as we have to define the
>> > committees ASAP.
>> >
>> > LOG must have the two main committees (high level and executive)
>> > basically defined by the end of this year. My *personal suggestion*
>> > is: CS accepts for the 1Net Steering Committee the nominating group
>> > which we defined for the Icann HL meeting, as proposed now. We will
>> > of course be able to keep an eye on them as we usually do. And let
>> > CS try and define the 2-3 names for the HL committee and 2 names
>> > for the exec committee as soon as possible (before this year ends).
>> >
>> > LOG agreed 1Net will be the conduit to send the names of all non-gov
>> > sectors to it, since there is representation of all sectors in their
>> > Steering Committee.
>> >
>> > BTW, in this (imperfect) way CS will be *far better* than the
>> > business community in terms of all balances. And please recall that
>> > the meeting is planned for about 1,000 participants, so plenty of
>> > space to come to SP and participate.
>> >
>> > []s fraternos with eyes on the ticking clock...
>> >
>> > --c.a.
>> >
>> > On 12/20/2013 09:14 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
>> >> Well dear fellow multistakeholders,
>> >>
>> >> Here is the state of play as we enter the holiday period.
>> >>
>> >> Business community chooses the biggest and richest without thought
>> >> for balance.
>> >>
>> >> Technical community needs more time to get the job done.
>> >>
>> >> Academic community works hard on deciding what an academic is.
>> >>
>> >> Civil society implodes.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> All sounds like business as usual to me (but maybe my cynicism
>> >> will wear off by morning).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I am not going to bore this list with a description of the civil
>> >> society processes that came up with a very good representative set
>> >> of names. If you want to know about the processes adopted, read
>> >> the IGC or Best Bits archives (or email me). Having worked with
>> >> the various civil society groups as an independent facilitator, I
>> >> can tell you that the civil society reps involved knew their
>> >> processes were imperfect, had little or no time to do anything
>> >> about it, but ploughed ahead to come up with a very good and
>> >> widely accepted result.
>> >>
>> >> Those chosen for civil society were selected for their capacity to
>> >> represent all of civil society, not just their own organisations,
>> >> and to work collegiately with other stakeholder groups. In a less
>> >> talented field perhaps Klaus or Michael, both of whom were
>> >> candidates, might have been chosen.
>> >>
>> >> Anyway
>> >>
>> >> All the best to you all and I look forward to some positive
>> >> advances in the new year!
>> >>
>> >> Ian Peter
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> discuss mailing list
>> >> discuss at 1net.org
>> >> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > discuss mailing list
>> > discuss at 1net.org
>> > http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t