[governance] Fwd: [discuss] /1net Steering/Coordination Commitee

[Norbert Bollow]

Thanks Adam.

So we need some volunteers. Who is willing and able to take the time to
serve in these capacities?

Greetings,
Norbert



Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:

> A request for civil society to provide names by the end of the year
> (11 days) for two committees.  Carlos' email below, but quote:
> 
> "2-3 names for the HL committee and 2 names for the exec committee
> as, soon as possible (before this year ends)"
> 
> These committees are described in the Brazilian Internet Steering
> Committee's announcement of November 26
> <http://www.nic.br/imprensa/releases/2013/rl-2013-62.htm> as:
> 
> 1. High-Level Multistakeholder Committee: Responsible for conducting
> the political articulation and fostering the involvement of the
> international community. 2. Executive Multistakeholder Committee:
> Responsible for organizing the event, including the agenda discussion
> and execution, and for the treatment of the proposals from
> participants and different stakeholders; 
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: "Carlos A. Afonso" <ca at cafonso.ca>
> > Date: December 20, 2013 10:01:48 PM GMT+09:00
> > To: Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>, Milton L Mueller
> > <mueller at syr.edu> Cc: discuss at 1net.org
> > Subject: Re: [discuss] /1net Steering/Coordination Commitee
> > 
> > Hi people,
> > 
> > Writing as a member of the local organizing group (LOG): we are
> > extremely worried because time is an independent variable and we
> > badly need a clear definition from all stakeholders as soon as
> > possible.
> > 
> > To CS: please forget about the other stakeholders (they have their
> > own challenges and they will have to solve them). If CS is going to
> > restart the infighting to define representing names, now on who
> > will sit at the 1Net Steering Committee, instead of building upon
> > the imperfect but reasonable process we managed to do so far, you
> > will be pushing LOG into a corner as we have to define the
> > committees ASAP.
> > 
> > LOG must have the two main committees (high level and executive)
> > basically defined by the end of this year. My *personal suggestion*
> > is: CS accepts for the 1Net Steering Committee the nominating group
> > which we defined for the Icann HL meeting, as proposed now. We will
> > of course be able to keep an eye on them as we usually do. And let
> > CS try and define the 2-3 names for the HL committee and 2 names
> > for the exec committee as soon as possible (before this year ends).
> > 
> > LOG agreed 1Net will be the conduit to send the names of all non-gov
> > sectors to it, since there is representation of all sectors in their
> > Steering Committee.
> > 
> > BTW, in this (imperfect) way CS will be *far better* than the
> > business community in terms of all balances. And please recall that
> > the meeting is planned for about 1,000 participants, so plenty of
> > space to come to SP and participate.
> > 
> > []s fraternos with eyes on the ticking clock...
> > 
> > --c.a.
> > 
> > On 12/20/2013 09:14 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
> >> Well dear fellow multistakeholders,
> >> 
> >> Here is the state of play as we enter the holiday period.
> >> 
> >> Business community chooses the biggest and richest without thought
> >> for balance.
> >> 
> >> Technical community needs more time to get the job done.
> >> 
> >> Academic community works hard on deciding what an academic is.
> >> 
> >> Civil society implodes.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> All sounds like business as usual to me (but maybe my cynicism
> >> will wear off by morning).
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I am not going to bore this list with a description of the civil
> >> society processes that came up with a very good representative set
> >> of names. If you want to know about the processes adopted, read
> >> the IGC or Best Bits archives (or email me). Having worked with
> >> the various civil society groups as an independent facilitator, I
> >> can tell you that the civil society reps involved knew their
> >> processes were imperfect, had little or no time to do anything
> >> about it, but ploughed ahead to come up with a very good and
> >> widely accepted result.
> >> 
> >> Those chosen for civil society were selected for their capacity to
> >> represent all of civil society, not just their own organisations,
> >> and to work collegiately with other stakeholder groups. In a less
> >> talented field perhaps Klaus or Michael, both of whom were
> >> candidates, might have been chosen.
> >> 
> >> Anyway
> >> 
> >> All the best to you all and I look forward to some positive
> >> advances in the new year!
> >> 
> >> Ian Peter
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> discuss mailing list
> >> discuss at 1net.org
> >> http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at 1net.org
> > http://1net.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t