[governance] [At-Large] The Internet as we know it is dead

[David Conrad]

On Aug 31, 2013, at 6:09 AM, JFC Morfin <jefsey at jefsey.com> wrote:
> Don't you think routing may have to do with details like architecture, RFCs, addressing plan, IP allocation, RIR strategies?

Sure.

> Why is there only one source of IPv6 addresses, when ITU had expressed the interest in managing its own IPv6 adressing plan?
> Why has Civil Society never been proposed to manage its own IPv6 adressing plan?

Because the usefulness of IPv6 addresses (like IPv4 addresses) is constrained by network topology, not politics or whether they feel good, thus for the Internet to actually scale, you need them to be allocated by service providers, not politicians?

> Why is this that RIRs have been the first to endorse OpenStand RFC 6852 http://open-stand.org/home-page/endorsements/?

Because they agreed with the document?

Regards,
-drc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130831/fc54c8f9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130831/fc54c8f9/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t