[IRPCoalition] [governance] Position by IT for Change and some other NGOs on enhanced cooperation

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Neither of the two. The bestbits statement is well drafted though a trifle naive in assumptions.

I do not intend to sign up to the IT4Change one and if the caucus were to sign up in consensus would request that my name be specifically excluded from it.

--srs (iPad)

On 30-Aug-2013, at 15:27, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> Marianne Franklin <m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Of course, if enough responses are in today to indicate a strong
>> enough consensus that the coalition signs up to both the statements
>> being put to us then let us know as soon as you can. And thanks in
>> advance for taking the time to do this.
> 
> Provided that enough other positive responses come in, I'm in favor
> of signing up to both the BestBits and the IT for Change statements.
> 
> Greetings,
> Norbert
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t