[governance] IGC and substantive issues (was Re: Digital restrictions...)

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Indeed, there was nothing normative in my statement.  
We can try to do substantive issues.
I just don't have a whole lot of hope.

But talking of hope, 
I expect I will be accused of being irrational again.

avri

On 29 Apr 2013, at 01:39, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:

> I don't think Avri meant there should be no substantive
> discussions on the list at all, rather just that in this
> particular issue (supporting the appeal that is, not
> html5/drm in general) it would be best avoided - and I agree,
> for time is limited and the appeal is simple enough,
> it would be more effective to support it as is now
> than with long and detailed argument later.
> 
> Of course nothing stops as from doing both, and certainly
> drm in general would merit a long substantive debate,
> but right now I think it'd be best to seek consensus for
> a simple "IGC supports this" -statement.


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t