[governance] [Dewayne-Net] REINHART AND ROGOFF: 'Full Stop,' We Made A Microsoft Excel Blunder In Our Debt Study, And It Makes A Difference
michael gurstein
gurstein at gmail.com
Wed Apr 17 20:55:55 EDT 2013
David,
My reference was overall to Economists' work as Economists (but I see where
there was probably an ambiguity in what I wrote... and yes, evidence based
policy is certainly a good idea if the evidence is accurate, appropriate,
unbiased i.e. not ideologically driven etc.etc. But there should always be a
caution and a modesty concerning linking policy particularly to theory in an
area as inexact as Economics and that's where the hubris comes in...
M
-----Original Message-----
From: David Conrad [mailto:drc at virtualized.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 5:02 PM
To: michael gurstein
Cc: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: Re: [governance] [Dewayne-Net] REINHART AND ROGOFF: 'Full Stop,' We
Made A Microsoft Excel Blunder In Our Debt Study, And It Makes A Difference
Michael,
On Apr 17, 2013, at 4:03 PM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> Economists of course, are split on the "scientific" validity of their
> work especially as it interfaces with the real/policy world
Well, no. As far as I can tell Economists, by and large, weren't split: the
vast majority considered the correlations R&R drew tenuous at best. It was
politicians, policy makers, and pundits that used the R&R paper as a
justification for positions they already held to the exclusion of evidence
and arguments to the contrary (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias).
> and the above should
> if nothing else, suggest modesty and caution before we go around
> flaunting and drawing policy directions from the supposed "scientific"
> validity of this or that set of observations or conclusions.
Actually, I'd argue basing policy direction on _scientifically valid_
observations and conclusions (which wasn't done for policies based on the
R&R paper) is far better than alternatives such as anecdotes, appeals to
emotion, over generalizations, accusations of hubris, etc.
Regards,
-drc
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list