[governance] Question about inappropriate behavior was RE: [] US House Bill ...
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Sun Apr 14 12:16:42 EDT 2013
BTW is this a a warning that if if i discuss such subject i am infringing the rules of this list?
Do the coordinators now control the content of the IGC list?
This is a worrisome trend.
avri
On 14 Apr 2013, at 02:38, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> [with IGC coordinator hat on]
>
> Avri Doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>> Does this statement, which [...]
>> the kind of thing the coordinators look for when deciding to start
>> the netiquette warning process?
>
> I'd like to quite generally discourage public discussion of whether
> some particular statement violates the posting rules or not. If some
> remark has the effect of increasing the degree to which the IGC is a
> hostile environment, then quoting the statement and criticizing it
> will increase that effect.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list