[governance] Question about inappropriate behavior was RE: [] US House Bill ...

[McTim]

On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> [with IGC coordinator hat on]
>
> Avri Doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>> Does this statement, which [...]
>> the kind of thing the coordinators look for when deciding to start
>> the netiquette warning process?
>
> I'd like to quite generally discourage public discussion of whether
> some particular statement violates the posting rules or not. If some
> remark has the effect of increasing the degree to which the IGC is a
> hostile environment, then quoting the statement and criticizing it
> will increase that effect.

I'd like to quite generally discourage unfounded public accusations of the type:

"How the term 'government control' has been deviously used to further
entrench hegemonies, and a neoliberal paradigm. "

Until the co-cos help with that, I will continue to ask questions.
You are being asked to carry out your role, not censor victims of
abuse!


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t