[governance] Question about inappropriate behavior was RE: [] US House Bill ...

[McTim]

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:28 PM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmmm… I would have thought that this was precisely the kind of statement
> that would precipitate debate rather than chill it.. but since I see that
> various distinguished members of US civil society have already, unbeknownst
> to me, made basically the same comments about their own government and the
> positions, perhaps rather hastily taken by some of their CS confreres,



Who in CS is supporting this proposed legislation?  I have not seen
any CS or T&A folks support it (perhaps I have missed those in my news
feeds).

 it
> seems that there may not be much debate arising from this after all; unless
> of course the USG chooses to react to my comments, which somehow I rather
> doubt :)
>
>
>
> So perhaps we can get on with trying to collaboratively work out appropriate
> civil society positions in an extremely complex and rapidly evolving global
> environment.

If you want to work collaboratively, perhaps not accusing people of
hypocrisy is not the best way to accomplish that goal!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t