[governance] Question about inappropriate behavior was RE: [] US House Bill ...

[Avri Doria]

michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote: 

.... Many in the rest of the world were astonished at the capacity of certain elements of US Civil Society and the Technical Community to offer uncritical support for what is so evidently self-serving hypocrisy of the form, ....

~~~

I am wondering, for calibration sake, as I never approve of people being warned/removed from the list unless it is for genuine hate speech, or overt and continuous bullying.

Does this statement, which chills debate, calls people of a particular nation and those of another stakeholder group hypocrites for their beliefs and creates a hostile environment, the kind of thing the coordinators look for when deciding to start the netiquette warning process?

Again I am not suggesting any such thing, just trying to understand the criteria for transparencies sake.

Thanks.





~~~
avri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130413/8e51a590/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t