[governance] Facebook and the nipplegate: New Yorker temporarily banned

Ivar A. M. Hartmann ivarhartmann at gmail.com
Mon Sep 17 10:02:07 EDT 2012


That's a great example! It had slipped my mind. Thank you for poiting it
out!

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:56 AM, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Monday, September 17, 2012, Ivar A. M. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> I don't believe Twitter or any other profit-seeking corporation makes an
>> effort to protect free speech systematically when it threatens their
>> income. Twitter's strategy of making content removals visible is a business
>> (PR) one, not a human rights protection mechanism.
>> How much transparency is enough transparency is indeed the key question
>> here. This can't be answered in a simple email, but I dare say enough
>> transparency is that which enables full scrutiny of a company or
>> government's actions.
>
>
>
> Like this:
>
>
> http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/
>
> Rgds, McTim
>
>
>
>
>
> Mct
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Best,
>> Ivar
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Daniel Kalchev <daniel at digsys.bg> wrote:
>>
>>>  The one about Twitter.
>>>
>>> I can understand Twitter claiming transparency, but can't believe for a
>>> moment they are indeed transparent about it (makes no sense).
>>>
>>> If you are not 100% transparent, because that is simply not possible,
>>> how much is "enough"?
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17.09.12 15:32, Ivar A. M. Hartmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Which of the two statements are you referring to, Daniel?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Daniel Kalchev <daniel at digsys.bg>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 17.09.12 04:17, Ivar A. M. Hartmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A jail full of dissidents is evidence of repression, but where's the
>>>>> evidence of thousands of deleted posts and pictures? Twitter is for the
>>>>> most part alone in trying to make content removal transparent.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  Why you believe this is the case?
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>>
>>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>>
>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
> indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120917/8d8b5286/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list