[governance] ICT4Change participating in ICANN & response

[Riaz K Tayob]

Do others feel the submission is "out of scope"?

If those who are interested in change, as opposed to legitimation by 
increased participation, feel it is out of scope then there is a process 
question of how to keep the out of scope issues in the discussion while 
while the issues that can be dealt with inside are... that is policy 
diversity... otherwise the centrifugal forces of the ICANN vortex could 
exclude third world concerns ... you see the issue is whether ICANN is 
relevant for IT4C or whether IT4C is relevant for ICANN = it would not 
do to conflate these ...


On 2012/09/13 01:25 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> It is excellent that they commented and also within the Comment 
> Period. I hope that there are others who have raised concerns also 
> engage the systems by making submissions etc.


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t