[governance] Big Porn v. Big Web Ruling Could Spell Trouble for ICANN / was Re: new gTLDs

[Pranesh Prakash]

parminder [2012-08-21 13:05]:
> I am
> speaking about applicability of the jurisdiction of US courts on all ICANN
> decisions. And since US courts apply US law, it is the applicability of US
> laws over all ICANN decisions, which is also called 'oversight'. And I dont
> like anything that calls itself a global system/ infrastructure to be
> subject to laws that I do not have an opportunity to participate in making.

Which law would you like ICANN to be subject to?  After all, given that 
they are a brick-and-mortar organization, they will have to subject 
themselves to one nation's law or another's.  Which one should it be, then?

~ Pranesh

-- 
Pranesh Prakash
Policy Director
Centre for Internet and Society
T: +91 80 40926283 | W: http://cis-india.org
PGP ID: 0x1D5C5F07 | Twitter: @pranesh_prakash

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120911/13888a8b/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t