IETF WAS Re: [governance] Enhanced Cooperation (was Re: reality check on economics)

[michael gurstein]

To quote myself in my original response to your original comment...

"The desire to keep governments out of technical areas is very likely a
commendable one, but in that instance it behooves the supporters of that
position to find some other means to ensure that those currently without a
voice in those discussions are provided with a means to have such a
participation."

M

-----Original Message-----
From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 6:45 AM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; michael gurstein
Cc: Anriette Esterhuysen
Subject: Re: IETF WAS Re: [governance] Enhanced Cooperation (was Re: reality
check on economics)


On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:48 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Just to be clear, my original back and forth with McTim was not around 
> ICT4D or the general state of the IT industry or CS in Africa but had 
> to do with ensuring that there were voices from LDC's who would have 
> the opportunity to participate in discussions around CIR's -- the 
> quote from McTim which I responded to was "nation states should have 
> zero "control" over CIRs", rich or poor!"

What role do you see nation states taking in re: "control" over CIRs?


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t