[governance] IGF and Enhanced Cooperation

[Roland Perry]

In message <463E2160-45C0-42EE-AE0F-810B41F955F1 at acm.org>, at 07:40:58 
on Tue, 29 May 2012, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> writes
>And we were told quite specifically by the hosts that their Ministerial
>had NOTHING to do with the IGF, so it makes no sense to let that stand
>in the way of anything.

Any diary clash that prevents an important stakeholder group from 
attending should be taken into consideration.

It's irrelevant whether or not the clashing event is part of the same 
process. eg If there was a special intersessional ICANN GAC meeting that 
Monday, which is certainly not part of the IGF, it would be rude to 
arrange an event to clash with it.
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t