[governance] Proposal for an IGF working group on EC

[Jeremy Malcolm]

Resending without digital signature.  It's been reported to me that the
list is messing up my emails and making them blank, and I think the
digital signature is to blame.

On 16/05/12 22:54, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:
> Attached (and below) is a statement and proposal on EC that we hope to
> discuss further, online, and then also in the CSTD consultation on
> enhanced cooperation on Friday 18 May here in Geneva. Note that this is
> not yet an official APC position. Members are still discussing it.

Thanks for the opportunity to give feedback on this draft statement
Anriette (which I am re-attaching for the benefit of the CC
recipients).  Personally and wearing my Consumers International hat, we
are convinced of the need for all stakeholders to collaboratively
develop a better global norm-setting framework for addressing
border-crossing public policy issues concerning the Internet.

India's CIRP model was welcome as the first serious proposal to respond
to the enhanced cooperation mandate from WSIS, which had otherwise been
deliberately neglected by all stakeholders who were either privileged
under the status quo, or were too risk-averse to sanction the
consideration of more globally democratic alternatives.

However, it would be premature to endorse the CIRP model (as the IT for
Change statement does too much for our liking), before all stakeholders
have had an opportunity to collaborate on improving it, in a setting
such as the CSTD working group that the IT for Change statement (to its
credit) calls for, or the IGF working group that APC is proposing to
call for through this statement.

Such a group, whether at the CSTD or the IGF, may be able to reach
consensus on a less traditional institutional form, that is further from
the UK-linked multilateral body that the CIRP represents, and closer to
a balanced network of stakeholders in which power over Internet policy
development is shared, as in a consociation.  This ultimately would be a
better outcome for civil society.

In either case, the first step is the formation of such a
multi-stakeholder working group, and we therefore wholeheartedly support
both the APC statement and the IT for Change statement in that regard. 
Our member in Geneva, Romain Houéhou, will be expressing these
sentiments during the consultation meeting.
-- 

*Dr Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Policy Officer*
Consumers International
Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599

Follow @ConsumersInt <http://twitter.com/Consumers_Int>

Like us at www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
<http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>

Read our email confidentiality notice
<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>. Don't
print this email unless necessary.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120518/24e61f67/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t