[governance] IGC Talking Points for Enhanced Cooperation workshop

[McTim]

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:54 AM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:
> Hi Izumi
>
>
> On May 17, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Izumi AIZU wrote:
>
> 1. we are encouraged to see the constructive dialogue around EC is
> proceeding
>
>
> How do you know it's going to be constructive?  Why would we prejudge how
> members might characterize the quality of the discussion?
>
> I don't really see the need for the IGC to try to slap together a statement
> on enhanced cooperation, a topic that's sharply divided members for seven
> years.  But if you feel compelled to say something, it would be consistent
> with the broad consensus over the years to endorse
>
> - multi-stakeholder participation, the need for IG forums where all
> stakeholders are equally, and effectively represented


+1


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t