[governance] IGC Talking Points for Enhanced Cooperation workshop

[William Drake]

Hi Izumi

On May 17, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Izumi AIZU wrote:

> 1. we are encouraged to see the constructive dialogue around EC is proceeding

How do you know it's going to be constructive?  Why would we prejudge how members might characterize the quality of the discussion?  

I don't really see the need for the IGC to try to slap together a statement on enhanced cooperation, a topic that's sharply divided members for seven years.  But if you feel compelled to say something, it would be consistent with the broad consensus over the years to endorse

> - multi-stakeholder participation, the need for IG forums where all
> stakeholders are equally, and effectively represented

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120517/fc302d9a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t