[governance] Cyber Dialogue 2012 / Conference details now online ...

[Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro]

Thanks Robert. Thank you Milton, I look forward to reading your paper.

Would people be interested in writing a Statement on Cyber Security?

I think it would be useful to have a statement on Cyber Security by the IGC?

What are your thoughts?

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:

> OK, let us see MM's response, but for my part McT clarified the ASO-NRO
> logic. After creation of NRO, I wondered why ASO was still in place, now I
> see there a close intertwining.
>
> --c.a.
>
>
> On 03/11/2012 01:38 PM, McTim wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/12, Milton L Mueller<mueller at syr.edu>  wrote:
>>
>>> For those interested, I was invited to contribute a paper on some aspect
>>> of
>>> stewardship, and chose IP addressing.
>>> http://www.cyberdialogue.**citizenlab.org/wp-content/**
>>> uploads/2012/2012papers/**CyberDialogue2012_Mueller.pdf<http://www.cyberdialogue.citizenlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/2012papers/CyberDialogue2012_Mueller.pdf>
>>>
>>
>> a few factual innaccuracies:
>>
>> "The NRO’s status as the ASO in ICANN’s cor-
>> porate governance structure allows the RIRs’
>> chief executives to appoint people directly to
>> the ICANN board, and also allows it to place
>> people on ICANN’s nominating committee,"
>>
>>
>> is incorrect, it's the ASO AC that actually chooses see:
>>
>> http://aso.icann.org/people/**icann-board-elections/2012-**elections/<http://aso.icann.org/people/icann-board-elections/2012-elections/>
>>
>> and:
>>
>> "While some of the RIRs
>> still have some available supplies"
>>
>> seems to indicate that some RIRs do not.  I don't think this is the case.
>>
>> and:
>>
>> 'The ASO of ICANN is nothing more than the
>> NRO, and the NRO is nothing more than a com-
>> bination of the staff and CEOs of the RIRs.'
>>
>> This is not true either.  The ASO AC are elected folk from the RIR
>> communities.  They make the decisions, the NRO act as the secretariat
>> to support them.
>>
>> and:
>>
>> "With the Internet well established as the
>> dominant data communications protocol and
>> a globalized institutional framework in place
>> (ICANN) there is no longer any political reason
>> to delegate address allocation to regions. "
>>
>> There is, folks in different regions still want to have regional
>> policies even after v4 depletion.
>>
>> Come to the Gambia in May and tell the AfriNIC Policy Development
>> Working Group that we will be obsolete after v6 deployment, I'm sure
>> most would disagree.
>>
>>
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>


-- 
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala

Tweeter: @SalanietaT
Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
Cell: +679 998 2851
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120312/aa040e5e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t