[governance] IGF 2012 - CIR?

[McTim]

Hi Milton,

On Monday, March 5, 2012, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> If they discuss IPv6, they must also discuss the emergence of trading
markets for scarce IPv4 addresses, which is actually the only relevant
policy issue at the moment and one which actually (unlike 90% of what is
now discussed at IGF) something that requires global coordination and
governance.
>

Exactly what global coordination and governance do you mean?

I thought you were a proponent of an unfettered v4 market!?

Rgds,

McTim



>
>
> Naturally I'd put myself forward as someone who both knows something
about that issue and would offer a refreshing alternative reality-check to
what you are likely to get from certain other sources.
>
>
>
> From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [mailto:
governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of William Drake
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 4:31 AM
> To: igf-cir at lists.frobbit.se
> Cc: Carlos A. Afonso; igf-cir at lists.frobbit.se; IGF Members;
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> Subject: [governance] Re: [cir] [igf_members] IGF 2012 - CIR?
>
>
>
> Hi Tulika
>
>
>
>  There is a MAG + working group that is actively debating the topics and
questions for the CIR session.  Jennifer Warren of Lockheed Corp, Is the
facilitator. The discussion unfortunately has fallen short of being
consensual, with Avri and I arguing for inclusion of the WCIT and other
geopolitical topics like enhanced cooperation, contentious string
selection, and jurisdiction and extraterritoriality (SOPA, ICE, etc) we
think are likely to be of broad interest in November, while business folks
have been less receptive to these matters and are plumping instead for more
narrow gauge and technical topics like Internet of Things, IPv6 (again!),
migration of resources to IP nets, and spectrum/mobile. I don't know Where
this end up, but my hope is that we can arrive at a balanced compromise on
four topics that gives each side a bit of what it wants,  the government
reps on the list have been silent, and it would be helpful to hear their
thoughts either way.  Since you are not on the (still active) 2011 MAG I
don't know if you can join, but you might try,  otherwise I'd be happy to
pass along any statements from you as inputs.
>
>
>
> Best
>
>
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 18:02, TULIKA PANDEY <tulika at nic.in> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I would like to hear some response to Carlos's concerns and inputs for
the CIR session as I tend to agree with all his suggestions, especially his
inputs on ITU initiatives.
>
>
>
>
>
> Tulika Pandey
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:
>
> Dear people,
>
> The February synthesis paper of the open consultations published in the
> IGF official site mentions the following regarding "critical Internet
> resources":
>
> --- begin doc citation ---
>
> 25. In terms of Critical Internet Resources it was seen by several
> commentators that further debate is needed around issues such as the
> institutional structure of IG, including the future of ICANN, IP
> addressing, root servers and Internet exchange points.
>
> 26. Several suggestions were made for the Critical Internet Issues
> theme, including, inter alia;
>
> • Best Practices for eliminating barriers to access to the Internet;
>
> • IPv6 and the impact and opportunities for the developing world that
> may result from the transition to IPv6 and how does the coming depletion
> of IPv4 addresses affect developing countries?
>
> • What is the effect of the deployment of multilingual domain names,
> i.e. IDN.IDN?
>
> • Issues of ICANN's naming policy and the impact of the new gTLDs and
> IDN gTLDs;
>
> • Technical issues such as DNS blocking and how such technical issues
> drive or impact policy.
>
> --- end doc citation ---
>
> In light of the ongoing ITU process leading to WCIT 2012 aiming at,
> among other goals, radically revising the 1988 ITR to try to take
> account of the ICT challenges posed by the Internet, I think the above
> points are far from sufficient.
>
> At a minimum, IGF's CIR "track" should include a review of the ITU
> meetings' outcomes.
>
> fraternal regards
>
> --c.a.
>
> _______________________________________________
> igf_members mailing list
> igf_members at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igf_members_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> --
> Tulika Pandey
> Additional Director
> Department of Information Technology
> Room 3089, Electronics Niketan
> 6 CGO Complex, Ne

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120305/bd6e2bfc/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t