[governance] FBI, DEA, IPv6 & ICANN

[John Curran]

On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:26 PM, "c.a." <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:

> It is *not* a technical matter, no matter how close I am from machine-room experts. No, it is *not* simply a technical matter to be bureucratically given to Ietf or even Nro. The Internet governance organization dealing with logical infra is Icann, not its branches or related technical fora. Unless it is not, I am wrong and we do need to look for one.

Can you elaborate how US LEA expressing concerns on their ability to perform their job when IPv6 is deployed (due to potentially less number registry updates) somehow is an ICANN Internet governance matter?  Are not the Regional Internet Registries to accept such input in their forums and allow discussion of the concerns?

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t