[governance]http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-release/2012/commerce-department-awards-contract-management-key-internet-functions-icann

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<77A59FC9477004489D44DE7FC6840E7B1061E7 at SUEX10-mbx-08.ad.syr.edu>, at 
17:32:04 on Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> writes
>A faster timetable is possible, if a solid proposal is developed within 
>a year, and NTIA is convinced that is the case within 2 more years of 
>administratively proper proceedings soliciting everyone's input on 
>same.  That ICANN, ISOC, and the RIRs are all on the record favoring a 
>shift helps, but is not sufficient.

Is this a post-Beckstrom ICANN view? I was always under the impression 
that one of his top priorities was that the IANA contract stayed with 
them. Given that policy development ought to be bottom-up, when should 
(in your opinion) ICANN start scheduling a WG to discuss this 'shift'.
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t