AW: [governance] Cerfing the Web, or Serfing the Web? (Understanding Google's Internet Evangelism against Internet Access Rights)

[Lorena Jaume-Palasi]

FYI

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ieeeinsights/2012/01/18/the-role-of-technology-i
n-taking-a-stand/

 

 

Lorena Jaume-Palasí

___________________________________________

 

Department of political Theory (Prof. Dr. Karsten Fischer)

Geschwister Scholl Institute for Political Sciences.

Ludwig Maximilians University

 

Von: governance at lists.cpsr.org [mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org] Im Auftrag
von Brice Abba
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2012 00:35
An: governance at lists.cpsr.org; lehto.paul at gmail.com
Betreff: RE: [governance] Cerfing the Web, or Serfing the Web?
(Understanding Google's Internet Evangelism against Internet Access Rights)

 

Daniel, 
+1
:)

  _____  

From: daniel at digsys.bg
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:37 +0200
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; lehto.paul at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [governance] Cerfing the Web, or Serfing the Web?
(Understanding Google's Internet Evangelism against Internet Access Rights)



On Jan 17, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Paul Lehto wrote:

 


Question: Why would humans understand and support property rights on the
Internet, but not understand or support human rights on the Internet?   

Answer:  Businesses pay humans to advocate for business property rights, and
to steer clear of advocating for human rights on the Internet except where
absolutely necessary or supportive of the business' bottom line.  Take away
the voices (in our imagination) of those on the payroll of various
businesses, and there would be every bit, if not more, acceptance of human
rights on the Internet as there presently is for property rights on the
Internet.   

 

I am still confused by all this. Perhaps it is some "western" type of
thinking, but it just does not make sense to me.

The same thing as when you argued about corporations being evil.

 

Property rights is one of the human rights. How could property rights be
against other human rights?

 

If it is a matter of balance, or rather a need for humans to exist, then one
can say for sure, that humans can exist without Internet. They can also
exist without property. They can for some time to survive even without food,
or water. I believe humans will survive least without air to breathe
 

 

My "fear" of declaring "access to Internet" is centered towards the abuse we
see every day with regards to "human rights". Many are killed daily, in the
name of "human rights". Countries are being invaded and drawn to war in the
name of "human rights"
. to name few.

 

Of course, everyone has the right to access the Internet. Call it human
right or not.. it is just a choice of wording. In another language, in
another culture it might mean something else. Even in the same
language/culture it might mean something else with a different Government.
We have seen this all the time.

 

But in order to access the Internet, it has to be accessible to everyone.
That means less regulation.

 

Daniel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120119/ab0c4bc9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t