[governance] Decision [Imran Ahmed Shah] Complaint against MAG Nomination
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Sun Feb 26 00:41:09 EST 2012
Dear Sala
Let me first state that, as a fait accompli, I would like Fouad's
nomination to stand as I suspect that it is the IGC's wish (and I
concur) that, although there have been numerous procedural problems
with this nomcom process, it would not want its outcomes to be nullified.
However, I am unable to agree with your judgement which summarily
disposes off one of most important institutions of the IGC - the appeals
committee. The judgement, in my view, is also unmaintainable because it
comes from an authority, an IGC co-coordinator, to check whose possible
abuse of power - whether deliberate or inadvertent - is one of the most
important task of the appeal's committee. Almost sounds like a coup :).
Well, only joking, in this instance.
All IGC office bearers have stood in their office till replaced by new
ones. Coordinators have often taken decisions past their 2 year period,
till they are replaced by a new set. And appeals committees have also
previously continued in the same way, till a new one is appointed. This
is the IGC convention, and its practical need and importance should be
obvious. In the view, I think, your judgement disposing off the appeal
committee is wrong. And it is dangerous to the extent that we are right
now left with no appeals committee.
An unsure and unclear nomcom with one of the two coordinator
incapacitated and no appeals committee looks like not a very good
situation for us to be....
I would request you, and Izumi, to amend your judgement in this respect.
In my view the appeals committee exists as present, while coordinators
should start the process of selecting a new one at the earliest.
parminder
On Thursday 16 February 2012 06:19 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> Dear Imran,
>
> Further to your complaint that you sent on February 2nd, 2012 and the
> MAG NomCom Report sent to the list yesterday on February 16th, 2012,
> kindly find the decision on the complaint that was raised on the 2nd
> February, 2012.
>
> Let me know if you would like to discuss the same.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> --
> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>
> Tweeter: @SalanietaT
> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
> Cell: +679 998 2851
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120226/6f100dd4/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list