[governance] Remote Participation
Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
Fri Feb 24 20:10:55 EST 2012
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Deirdre Williams <
williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps we need a statement that communicates 2 diffrent points of view?
> Compromise is not always possible.
Would you like to Suggest some drafting languahe to that effect?
> Deirdre
>
>
> On 24 February 2012 19:51, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <
> salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone how do you all propose to reach a compromise between what
>> Adam raised and others are raising. Please make suggestions to drafting
>> language in the Statement Workspace, see:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/digressit/archives/47
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Avri Doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I agree with what has been said in this thread by the past few writers.
>>>
>>> I used to not beleive in having a Remote only meeting, but now I think I
>>> do.
>>> I tried to participate in meetings remotely and found it to be a near
>>> total failure. I am live in a bandwidth rich zone.
>>>
>>> Plus even when it works technically it does not work in a practical
>>> sense unless the chair, the secretariat, the remote moderator and the other
>>> participants actually make a concerted allowance for it. And I do not
>>> think I have ever seen in a case where everyone was making allowance.
>>>
>>> The best it ever was, was when the RCWG was doing all the work, and they
>>> really had to work hard to make it even resemble particpation.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24 Feb 2012, at 18:20, Deirdre Williams wrote:
>>>
>>> > I also support what Ginger and Marilia and Anriette are saying.
>>> > What I could possibly want more is a system that works rather than an
>>> intention on paper. I hope this is not too blunt but sometimes I feel that
>>> 'people' are saying "remote participation is a good thing", and then just
>>> stopping there. An excellent ploy might be to have just one meeting remote
>>> access only - so that everyone knows how the other side lives.
>>> > And I think that we all need to fight for it to make it 'really real'.
>>> Yes there will be breakdowns - electrical and otherwise - and yes we're
>>> only just scratching the surface of the language difficulties, but if we
>>> believe in it we can really make it happen.
>>> > Only we have to believe in it and support it - all of us.
>>> > Deirdre
>>> >
>>> > On 24 February 2012 19:04, Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all..at two of the workshops I was involved in in Nairobi RM did not
>>> > work.. either not at all, or partially. IN the last few months I have
>>> > had bad experiences in trying to be a remote participant in Geneva
>>> based
>>> > meetings. When my slow connection speed from South Africa interfered
>>> > with my access to the meeting I was blamed for this.. and told that
>>> > other people had no problems (they happened to be in Paris and Rio..
>>> > places with much faster internet than what I have access to).
>>> >
>>> > As for the MAG meetings last week.. I personally spoke to IGF
>>> > secretariat about the difficulties that remote participants were having
>>> > in the morning. There was no improvement because the person responsible
>>> > was having to take notes that were displayed from his PC onto the
>>> > screen. I raised the concerns on the last day directly, during lunch,
>>> > with the Chair from Azerbaidjan and with the Chair and then there was a
>>> > response.
>>> >
>>> > But, if RM was taken seriously enough then more resoures would have
>>> been
>>> > made available. I am not blaming the secretariat.. they were stretched
>>> > and doing the best they can. The problem is deeper than just this one
>>> > incident.
>>> >
>>> > I strongly support Ginger's points, and Marilia's additions. RM has to
>>> > be taken MUCH more seriously if it is going to be a serious way for
>>> > people to participate, and influence processes, without being
>>> physically
>>> > present.
>>> >
>>> > RM is beginning to feel like MSP (Multi-stakeholder participation). The
>>> > fact that it 'exists' is used to give credibility to processes that
>>> > still have a very long way to go in being really inclusive. If RM is
>>> to
>>> > be taken seriously it needs more focus and more budget. As long as RM
>>> is
>>> > seen primarily as a way to 'save money and look good' it will not be
>>> > effective as an alternative to having generally excluded actors
>>> > physically present at meetings.
>>> >
>>> > Anriette
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 24/02/12 22:00, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>>> > > I support Ginger's e-mail, so I will not repeat her arguments.
>>> > >
>>> > > There is only one additional point I would like to make in response
>>> to
>>> > > Adam, when he quoted what the Chair's report said about remote
>>> > > participation. While it is totally understandable that people who
>>> happen
>>> > > to be working for the IGF will come up with positive results and be
>>> > > inclined to see the bright side of things, I believe that civil
>>> society
>>> > > is expected to present more meaningful, in-depth and constructive
>>> > > analysis of the process, including of remote participation.
>>> > >
>>> > > The difficulties remote participants faced went beyond a simple power
>>> > > shortage on the last day of the IGF, as you implied. Technical and
>>> human
>>> > > resources were not sufficient. This is exemplified by: simple audio
>>> > > adjustments that technicians did not know how to perform, or by the
>>> fact
>>> > > that the hired staff of remote moderators you mentioned were on
>>> strike
>>> > > on the first day of the IGF because they were not receiving enough
>>> money
>>> > > to cover for basic expenses at the venue, or even by the fact that
>>> some
>>> > > workshop organizers, despite all the requests from the secretariat,
>>> did
>>> > > not bother to reply if they had a moderator or not.
>>> > >
>>> > > So the fact that remote participation is a priority on IGF papers, as
>>> > > you pointed out, says little. You asked Deidre "what she could
>>> possibly
>>> > > want more". If you read Ginger's e-mail you will find a list of
>>> wishes.
>>> > > And if the community thinks RP is important (and I think that the
>>> > > increasing interest for remote participation confirms it is ), then
>>> we
>>> > > should make a collective effort to take the opportunity of the
>>> process
>>> > > of discussing the implementation of IGF improvements to give RP a
>>> big push.
>>> > >
>>> > > Marília
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com
>>> > > <mailto:gpaque at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Adam said:
>>> > >
>>> > > I think it's petty to complain about technical problems with the
>>> > > transcripts etc from the MAG meeting, bad connections happen all
>>> the
>>> > > time (and if MAG members can't work out how to tell a group of
>>> people
>>> > > they are having problems with a connection it perhaps says more
>>> about
>>> > > them than it does about the secretariat/moderators.)
>>> > >
>>> > > I think that this full discussion and support for RP is very
>>> > > important and exciting.
>>> > >
>>> > > I think that using the occasion of the recent meetings as an
>>> example
>>> > > and illustration is a mistake. I agree with Adam that the tech
>>> > > glitches during last week's meetings should not even be
>>> > > addressed--these are obvious. Placing emphasis on tech details
>>> draws
>>> > > attention from the more valid, and more important principles. I
>>> know
>>> > > I am repeating myself, but I think they boil down to just one:
>>> > >
>>> > > RP must be institutionalized in meeting processes.
>>> > >
>>> > > The only serious problem I see with last week's meetings was the
>>> > > lack of a remote moderator and clear processes. If RP -- and I
>>> mean
>>> > > remote participation and remote engagement, not remote
>>> observation
>>> > > -- were an automatic, standard part of meeting strategies and
>>> > > processes, the inclusion of an onsite remote moderator would have
>>> > > been a given, as much as the presence of the traditional chair
>>> and
>>> > > moderator. I dare to say that if one of the members of the RPWG
>>> had
>>> > > been at the meetings, they might have 'requested' to be
>>> 'allowed' to
>>> > > act as remote moderator. Remote moderation and remote
>>> participation
>>> > > should not depend on collaboration of volunteers and serendipity.
>>> > > Implementation of RP may always need the collaboration of
>>> > > volunteers, and the RPWG exists as a volunteer organization,
>>> seeking
>>> > > the privilege of collaborating, but the planning process should
>>> > > originate in the IGF structure itself, not in the action of
>>> volunteers.
>>> > >
>>> > > If RP were institutionalized in the IGF process, the Secretariat
>>> > > might ask the RPWG for collaboration, and issue a call for
>>> volunteers.
>>> > >
>>> > > If RP were institutionalized in the IGF process, the Secretariat
>>> > > might include a RPWG (or other mechanism) liaison for strategy,
>>> > > planning and process and instead of an endless series of ad hoc
>>> > > situations.
>>> > >
>>> > > If RP were institutionalized, Remote Hubs -- an innovation of the
>>> > > RPWG catalysed by Marilia's energy and organization -- would
>>> become
>>> > > part of the IGF process, not the RPWG process, would include
>>> remote
>>> > > hubs whenever appropriate and would include support for regional
>>> IGFs.
>>> > >
>>> > > I would prefer to see a strong, clear, short statement asking
>>> that
>>> > > RP be institutionalised (maybe that is not the appropriate word)
>>> as
>>> > > an integral part of the IGF meeting process.
>>> > >
>>> > > Establishing principles and guidelines is separate process which
>>> has
>>> > > been started, and should be coordinated to take advantage of, and
>>> > > include the different input. It should not be done in a hurry, in
>>> > > response to one frustrating meeting. Nor should one frustrating
>>> > > meeting opaque the progress the IGF has made toward inclusive
>>> RP. We
>>> > > should use this meeting to energize forward progress in an
>>> orderly
>>> > > manner. Can we form a better strategy and focus for productive
>>> > > results? I think so. I have not made comments on the existing
>>> > > statement, because I would re-write it completely, with a
>>> different
>>> > > approach, with points I have made above.
>>> > >
>>> > > Is it proper/possible for me to propose an alternate text? I do
>>> not
>>> > > have the sense that there is consensus for the posts I have made
>>> > > previously, so I have not done so.
>>> > >
>>> > > Anyway, again, my 2 cents. Cheers for the energy around remote
>>> > > participation!
>>> > >
>>> > > Ginger
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Ginger (Virginia) Paque
>>> > >
>>> > > VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu <mailto:VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu>
>>> > > Diplo Foundation
>>> > >
>>> > > Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme
>>> > > www.diplomacy.edu/ig <http://www.diplomacy.edu/ig>
>>> > > /The latest from Diplo..../From the fundamentals of diplomacy to
>>> the
>>> > > most exciting new trends: check our three online courses
>>> starting in
>>> > > May 2012: *Bilateral Diplomacy*, *Diplomacy of Small States*, and
>>> > > *E-diplomacy*. Apply now to reserve your place:
>>> > > http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses*//*
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 23 February 2012 05:13, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp
>>> > > <mailto:ajp at glocom.ac.jp>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Comment below:
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Salanieta T.
>>> Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>> > > <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
>>> > > <mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> > > > Dear All,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Firstly thank you Deirdre for copying it onto word and
>>> making
>>> > > it much easier
>>> > > > to incorporate the new feedback that we received from
>>> Schombe,
>>> > > Jovan,
>>> > > > Anriette, Jeremy, Roland, Mariela etc.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Whilst I am copying the text onto this email, I will also
>>> > > place it on the
>>> > > > Statement Workspace as well:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > STATEMENT BY THE CIVIL SOCIETY INTERNET GOVERNANCE CAUCUS
>>> ON
>>> > > REMOTE
>>> > > > PARTICIPATION
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We would like to acknowledge the excellent work that the
>>> > > Internet Governance
>>> > > > Forum Remote Participation Working Group have been doing
>>> over
>>> > > the last five
>>> > > > years. We appreciate the numerous hours of sacrifice and
>>> work
>>> > > behind the
>>> > > > scenes to build remote participation to what it is today.
>>> We
>>> > > have seen how
>>> > > > whilst Technology is important, that it goes hand in hand
>>> with
>>> > > extraordinary
>>> > > > levels of sacrifice and commitment. It is this commitment
>>> > > that enables the
>>> > > > spirit of the IGF which is in sharing, dialogue,
>>> collaboration and
>>> > > > ultimately access.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We are fortunate that the Internet Governance Forum
>>> > > Secretariat and UN DESA
>>> > > > are open .and committed to continued improvements to Remote
>>> > > Participation.
>>> > > > Each year the IGF RPWG commences its operations with
>>> training
>>> > > of remote
>>> > > > moderators many weeks ahead of the meeting, where they
>>> discuss
>>> > > with remote
>>> > > > hubs and encourage participation and liaise with the
>>> > > Secretariat to make
>>> > > > remote participation a reality.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We would like to reiterate and underscore that remote
>>> > > participation is a
>>> > > > crucial part of organizing the Internet Governance Forum
>>> (IGF)
>>> > > and we
>>> > > > appreciate the effort to provide remote participation for
>>> the Open
>>> > > > Consultation, the Multi-stakeholder Advisory Group (MAG)
>>> > > meetings, and the
>>> > > > MAG meeting this month – February 2012 – which was opened
>>> to
>>> > > observers.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The IGC believes that Remote Participation (RP) should be
>>> an
>>> > > integral part
>>> > > > of Internet Governance and IGF Policy Processes. It is
>>> > > impossible to sustain
>>> > > > an inclusive global policy process without effective remote
>>> > > participation.
>>> > > > We would like to explore how we can assist in working
>>> together
>>> > > to address
>>> > > > the issues raised in 2008 by various stakeholders that have
>>> > > yet to be
>>> > > > addressed[1].
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The MAG and IGF Secretariats should start working with the
>>> > > host to ensure
>>> > > > that real time transcriptions are available for all
>>> sessions
>>> > > and not just
>>> > > > the Main Sessions.
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > from the Nairobi chair's summary document:
>>> > >
>>> > > "The entire meeting was Webcast, with video streaming
>>> provided from
>>> > > the main session room and audio streaming provided from all
>>> workshop
>>> > > meeting rooms. All the main sessions and workshops had real
>>> time
>>> > > transcription. The text transcripts and video of all
>>> meetings were
>>> > > made available through the IGF Website."
>>> > >
>>> > > I think it's petty to complain about technical problems with
>>> the
>>> > > transcripts etc from the MAG meeting, bad connections happen
>>> all the
>>> > > time (and if MAG members can't work out how to tell a group
>>> of
>>> > > people
>>> > > they are having problems with a connection it perhaps says
>>> more
>>> > > about
>>> > > them than it does about the secretariat/moderators.)
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > >
>>> > > Adam
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > We would like to commend the excellent work of the
>>> technical
>>> > > team from
>>> > > > Politecnico di Torino, (The Polytechnic University of
>>> Turin)
>>> > > which was
>>> > > > originally brought by our colleague and former IGC Civil
>>> > > Society Coordinator
>>> > > > Vittorio Bertola.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > However, we would like to point out some difficulties that
>>> > > occurred with the
>>> > > > system during the open MAG meeting. On the third day,
>>> morning
>>> > > session, (the
>>> > > > second day of the open MAG meeting), remote observers were
>>> > > effectively
>>> > > > excluded because they had no access to live transcript.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Also MAG members trying to participate online had
>>> difficulty
>>> > > in contacting
>>> > > > moderators, partly because the moderators were serving more
>>> > > than one
>>> > > > function.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We strongly urge MAG and IGF Secretariats and ourselves to
>>> > > consider the
>>> > > > following for the future IGF organizing work and the IGF
>>> > > itself, and work
>>> > > > together to bring them about:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Ensuring equal participation between online and offline
>>> > > participants
>>> > > > through planning meetings to give online and offline
>>> > > participants an equal
>>> > > > opportunity to participate and contribute to meetings.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Ensuring that there is sufficient capacity and
>>> appropriate
>>> > > bandwidth to
>>> > > > sustain remote participation by liaising with hosts well in
>>> > > advance to
>>> > > > enable greater interactions from offline participants.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Preparing a clear comprehensive guideline for remote
>>> > > participation and
>>> > > > its moderation and post session or meeting reporting for
>>> > > meeting hosts,
>>> > > > facilitators and chairs.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Clearly advertising opportunities for RP in advance of
>>> all
>>> > > meetings,
>>> > > > with clear guidance for participants on the opportunities
>>> to
>>> > > engage through
>>> > > > RP that will be available.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > ·Always assigning exclusive remote participation
>>> > > coordinator/moderators (who
>>> > > > do not have other jobs at the same time, and are
>>> responsible for
>>> > > > interactions between the meeting’s physical
>>> > > participants/current speaker,
>>> > > > the Chair and the remote participants).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Establishing a clear procedure that would encourage
>>> remote
>>> > > participants
>>> > > > to intervene. Such a system is desirable both for those
>>> > > physically present
>>> > > > in Geneva and those observing the meeting remotely.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Providing as much interactivity as possible by giving
>>> remote
>>> > > > participants to interact and engage in meetings.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Providing multiple methods – video, voice and text
>>> > > channel, as well as
>>> > > > real-time transcription and video streaming – of coverage
>>> of
>>> > > the meeting
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Enabling the meeting and remote participation through
>>> > > interactive
>>> > > > presentations access through RP.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Creating a select Task force or Working Group created
>>> that has
>>> > > > representatives from the Government, Private Sector and
>>> Civil
>>> > > Society that
>>> > > > is dedicated to seeing improvements of Remote
>>> > > Participation and to ensure
>>> > > > the incorporation of critical elements that have been
>>> > > highlighted to ensure
>>> > > > improved remote participation processes.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Because only limited funds are available for face- to
>>> > > -face participation,
>>> > > > this issue is crucially important to all stakeholders from
>>> all
>>> > > > constituencies who are entitled to participate in the
>>> > > meetings, and who wish
>>> > > > to do so from a remote location. Meeting Chairs also play a
>>> > > central role in
>>> > > > creating a dynamic and inclusive environment that welcomes
>>> remote
>>> > > > participation.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We also encourage greater partnership between the
>>> governments
>>> > > and private
>>> > > > sector in enhancing remote participation.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We have to move beyond advocacy to listing and creating
>>> > > tangible outcomes to
>>> > > > make improved, stable and sustainable remote participation
>>> a
>>> > > reality.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > There are regions around the world where transportation is
>>> > > extremely
>>> > > > expensive and one such region is the Pacific which has 22
>>> > > countries and
>>> > > > territories. Remote participation was the only way that
>>> any of
>>> > > these
>>> > > > countries could access the IGF.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > However there is room to improve processes and create an
>>> IGF
>>> > > culture where
>>> > > > remote participation is prioritised through exploring
>>> tested
>>> > > methodology.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The appropriate technical solutions need also to be
>>> explored
>>> > > as well
>>> > > > bandwidth and ensuring that there is uninterrupted power
>>> > > supply and
>>> > > > redundancy options where backup generators are critical to
>>> > > maintain a
>>> > > > consistent and seamless flow. The MAG and IGF Secretariats
>>> > > should also
>>> > > > ensure that there is sufficient and dedicated bandwidth
>>> > > capacity to sustain
>>> > > > the volume of traffic from remote participation.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Aside from having the appropriate technical solutions and
>>> > > should also
>>> > > > include the following:-
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Outreach.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Mapping local and regional stakeholders;
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Coordinating with people on the ground
>>> significantly
>>> > > before the
>>> > > > IGF in a series of strategic roll out.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Creation of Guidelines for Meeting Chairs and
>>> > > Moderators whilst
>>> > > > noting the limitations.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Identifying how the private sector, civil society
>>> > > and governments
>>> > > > can be better involved in the remote hubs etc.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > · Encourage greater collaboration between the IGF
>>> RPWG
>>> > > and national,
>>> > > > sub regional and regional IGFs.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > We also express our support of the IGF RPWG which published
>>> > > guidelines and
>>> > > > recommendations for remote participation and IGF 2011 WS-67
>>> > > participants
>>> > > > prepared a draft of e-participation principles.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Ends
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > ________________________________
>>> > > >
>>> > > > [1] http://wiki.igf-online.net/wiki/IGF_Virtual_Community
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Deirdre Williams
>>> > > > <williams.deirdre at gmail.com
>>> > > <mailto:williams.deirdre at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Dear Sala,
>>> > > >> I have been unavoidably out of contact all day, and am
>>> just
>>> > > catching up
>>> > > >> with reading the messages.
>>> > > >> I am not clear which document you want me to send.
>>> > > >> I have attached a word copy of my response yesterday,
>>> > > although from
>>> > > >> reading the discussion that has perhaps been superseded
>>> > > during the
>>> > > >> discussions today?
>>> > > >> Please let me know as I would be delighted to help.
>>> > > >> De
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On 22 February 2012 14:15, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>> > > >> <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
>>> > > <mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Dear Deirdre,
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> As you know our initial statement was used by the civil
>>> > > society component
>>> > > >>> of the CSTDWG as advised by Marilia.
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> If you could please send it in a word document that
>>> would be
>>> > > super
>>> > > >>> helpful and easy to put up on the Statement Workspace. We
>>> > > will also be
>>> > > >>> sending our Statement to the IGF Secretariat.
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Kind Regards,
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> --
>>> > > >>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> Tweeter: @SalanietaT
>>> > > >>> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>> > > >>> Cell: +679 998 2851 <tel:%2B679%20998%202851>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> --
>>> > > >> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but
>>> knowledge"
>>> > > Sir William
>>> > > >> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Tweeter: @SalanietaT
>>> > > > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>> > > > Cell: +679 998 2851 <tel:%2B679%20998%202851>
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> > > > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> > > > governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>> > > <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
>>> > > > To be removed from the list, visit:
>>> > > > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>> > > >
>>> > > > For all other list information and functions, see:
>>> > > > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> > > > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>> > > > http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Translate this email:
>>> http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ____________________________________________________________
>>> > > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> > > governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>> > > <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
>>> > > To be removed from the list, visit:
>>> > > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>> > >
>>> > > For all other list information and functions, see:
>>> > > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> > > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>> > > http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>> > >
>>> > > Translate this email:
>>> http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ____________________________________________________________
>>> > > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> > > governance at lists.igcaucus.org <mailto:
>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
>>> > > To be removed from the list, visit:
>>> > > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>> > >
>>> > > For all other list information and functions, see:
>>> > > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> > > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>> > > http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>> > >
>>> > > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
>>> > > FGV Direito Rio
>>> > >
>>> > > Center for Technology and Society
>>> > > Getulio Vargas Foundation
>>> > > Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------
>>> > anriette esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
>>> > executive director, association for progressive communications
>>> > www.apc.org
>>> > po box 29755, melville 2109
>>> > south africa
>>> > tel/fax +27 11 726 1692
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ____________________________________________________________
>>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> > governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>> > To be removed from the list, visit:
>>> > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>> >
>>> > For all other list information and functions, see:
>>> > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>> > http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>> >
>>> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir
>>> William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>> > ____________________________________________________________
>>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> > governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>> > To be removed from the list, visit:
>>> > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>> >
>>> > For all other list information and functions, see:
>>> > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>> > http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>> >
>>> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>
>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>
>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>>
>> Tweeter: @SalanietaT
>> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>> Cell: +679 998 2851
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>
--
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
Tweeter: @SalanietaT
Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
Cell: +679 998 2851
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120225/0ec48859/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list