[governance] Re: Managing Critical Internet Resources [IGF 2012 - MAG Consultations]

[Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Louis Pouzin (well) <pouzin at well.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 15:17
Subject: [governance] On the MAG thematic working groups
To: "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>

Hi Sala,

I'd be interested in a sub-theme within managing critical internet
resources:

*Multiple name spaces in internet*
 - diversity of language scripts
 - regional spaces
 - brand names management
 - diversisty of jurisdictions
 - directory structures
 - name collisions
 - scopes
 - inter-operability
 - (more)

Worth a workshop with a half dozen stakeholders.

I agree with Louis' suggestion. I hav

Cheers

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Sala,
>
> My 2 cents:  I see 3 topics here not 5:
>
>    1)    IXPs &   MIGRATION OF RESOURCES
>>
>
>    - Transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 [Shared Lessons]
>    -
>       - Getting various stakeholders within developing countries
>       particularly policy makers to see the linkages - encouraging greater
>       cohesion in the area of policy;
>       - It will be good to see various regulatory practices around the
>       world etc
>
>
>    2)    [SMART GRIDS] &   INTERNET OF THINGS
>    -
>
>    Personally I call this category - wireless grids. fyi we are on track
>    towards releasing version 0.1 open specs March 26 @ TEDxHarlem.  Anyway,
>    smart grids, generally speaking, aren't that smart; and the 'things' in
>    isolation are just - things. So real issue is how does one share resources
>    among grids and things; and not pretend all life will be in the cloud so
>    who needs to worry our pretty little heads about who controls what -
>    resources, including things.
>
> In sum, imho these 2 together are more interesting and relevant for IGF
> than either alone, which odds are would turn into corporate sales pitches
> for particular big brands...in the usual suspect category
>
>
>   3)    SPECTRUM ALLOCATION FOR MOBILE SERVICES AND THE DIMENSION OF
>> PUBLIC INTEREST
>>
>>
>>  (Sounds good to me; though  I wonder what our ITU friends will think of
>> IGF engaging on spectrum allocation ; )
>>
>
>
>
>>  Kind Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>>
>>  Tweeter: @SalanietaT
>> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
>> Cell: +679 998 2851
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>
>  Tweeter: @SalanietaT
> Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
> Cell: +679 998 2851
>
>
>
>


-- 
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala

Tweeter: @SalanietaT
Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
Cell: +679 998 2851
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120222/1e41b173/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t