[governance] [] US, UK and Canada refuse to sign UN's internet treaty

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

A Guadalajara,-10 resolution is as good as it gets.

thanks

avri

On 22 Dec 2012, at 20:28, Peter H. Hellmonds wrote:

> You wrote:
>> Which ITU treaty or ITU standard defines what "Unsolicited bulk
> communications"  means?
> 
> Your question got me searching and I found something:
> 
> In ITU RESOLUTION 130 (Rev. Guadalajara, 2010)
> http://www.itu.int/osg/csd/intgov/resoultions_2010/PP-10/RESOLUTION_130.pdf
> on "Strengthening the role of ITU in building confidence and security in the
> use of information and communication technologies", there is a reference
> saying "that although there are no universally agreed upon definitions of
> spam and other terms in this sphere, spam was characterized by ITU-T Study
> Group 2, at its June 2006 session, as a term commonly used to describe
> unsolicited electronic bulk communications over e-mail or mobile messaging
> (SMS, MMS), usually with the objective of marketing commercial products or
> services"
> 
> It may not be a treaty or a standard, but exemplifies the way this is
> considered.
> 
> Is this helpful to the discussion?


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t