[governance] Fwd: Your sign on requested- Civil society statement post-WCIT

[Avri Doria]

As the IGC is as divided, if not more, than the WCIT itself, I do not see how it is possible for this group to come up with a consensus statement on the WCIT.

avri


On 22 Dec 2012, at 07:05, Norbert Bollow wrote:

> McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> If IGC doesn't sign on to this, will we be making our own statement
>> that will come out of Sala's Framework?
> 
> Given that the WCIT related discourse has become such a prominent part
> of the Internet Governance related debates, and that a significant
> amount of IGC effort has already been committed to analysing it, I
> think that Tim's suggestion is good to use the output of that WCIT
> analysis effort as a starting point for an IGC statement on WCIT and
> the revised ITRs and (most importantly, because that is what can be
> influenced now) how the revised ITRs should be interpreted and
> implemented.
> 
> Greetings,
> Norbert
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t