[governance] Another conflict of interest at ICANN : SAD !!

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 13:06:54 EST 2012


Gideon,

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Gideon <gideonrop at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> His report was only on the present discussions and not future.

Your employer has cast aspersions on 2 Board Members.

These allegations were found to be without merit.

You (DCA) should apologize.



  So he is
> essentially saying while there is no COI on current discussions, there could
> potentially be in future GTLD making process and should be monitored by the
> Board.  I am posting the whole paragraph while you made your own selection.
>


Of course, the Board should remain cognizant of potential COI issues,
that goes without saying.

Don't try to suggest that you didn't get bitch-slapped by pointing out
that I included one sentence from the blog!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list