[governance] Another conflict of interest at ICANN : SAD !!
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 13:06:54 EST 2012
Gideon,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Gideon <gideonrop at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> His report was only on the present discussions and not future.
Your employer has cast aspersions on 2 Board Members.
These allegations were found to be without merit.
You (DCA) should apologize.
So he is
> essentially saying while there is no COI on current discussions, there could
> potentially be in future GTLD making process and should be monitored by the
> Board. I am posting the whole paragraph while you made your own selection.
>
Of course, the Board should remain cognizant of potential COI issues,
that goes without saying.
Don't try to suggest that you didn't get bitch-slapped by pointing out
that I included one sentence from the blog!
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list