[governance] Forbes Piece on the Google Campaign
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Thu Dec 6 00:01:30 EST 2012
On Wednesday 05 December 2012 10:52 PM, michael gurstein wrote:
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/jodywestby/2012/12/04/googles-media-campaign-aga
> inst-the-un-slapped-down/
Highlights very well the bogey that ITU has nothing to do with the
Internet. It always had and will. ITRs that were written in the pre
Internet era, in 1988, being revised in 2012 have to take explicit
notice of this fact. That would be the default.
But how much propaganda and subterfuge has gone to deny this simple and
obvious point. Content regulation, globally versus nationally configured
routing of Internet traffic and DNS management are specific issues in IG
and if these areas are to be kept out of ITU/ITRs (as I believe they
should) then we should directly say that.... and put specific text to
that effect in the ITRs. Keeping these specific issues away from ITU/ITR
does not need us to say that the entire Internet system has to remain
untouched by ITRs/ITU.
Not to take explicit note of the Internet in the ITRs would simply look
too contrived, and by itself give a strong message. And that exactly is
what the powers that illegitimately dominate how the Internet is being
shaped today want - to give out the clear and strong message 'Internet
is to be kept beyond any/all regulation'. That is all, or mostly, what
is there to the Google's campaign and US backing or rather fronting of it.
Absence of any explicit mention of the Internet in the ITRs will send an
especially clear and strong signal to the national regulatory systems to
keep their hands off the Internet - which would, inter alia, mean the
end of net neutrality movement apart from end to any other regulatory
influence on our communications systems of the future. This ill-serves
pulbic interest, especially the interest of the weaker and marginalised
sections. But their voices have not been present in the civil society
debates around ITR/ITU. That is the problem with multistakeholderism of
the kind practised in the IG space - whoever can manage to reach the
table will be heard...
parminder
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list