[governance] UN & Information Security

[Fouad Bajwa]

Why do you think the single vote is always against it. Everyone talks about
cyber protection but one wants to retain counter cyber protection rights
and act beyond.

Fouad Bajwa
On Aug 16, 2012 2:05 AM, "Fahd A. Batayneh" <fahd.batayneh at gmail.com> wrote:

> An interesting paper.
>
> It mentions that "*With respect to military applications of information
> technology, the US considered an international convention to be ‘completely
> unnecessary’ as ‘the law of armed conflict and its principles of necessity,
> proportionality and limitation of collateral damage already govern the use
> of such technologies’*".
>
> The report also states later on that "*After the first GGE process, the
> dynamics of the First Committee discussions on international information
> security changed considerably. Russia opened the resolution for
> co-sponsorship, while the United States started voting against it in
> subsequent years. Between 2005 and 2008 the US was the sole country to vote
> against the Resolution that attracted co-sponsors during the same time*".
>
> It goes on to say that "*Recommendations also met the request of several
> nations to elaborate common terms and definitions relevant to the
> Resolution. Further, information exchange on national legislation and
> national ICT security strategies, policies and best practices were
> recommended as well as identification of measures to support
> capacity-building in less developed countries*"
>
> And we all wonder why there is no proper initiatives in hand to combat and
> reduce cyber-threats, and increase levels of security online.
>
> Fahd
>
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:09 AM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <
> wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
>
>> FYI
>>
>> http://ict4peace.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Eneken-GGE-2012-Brief.pdf
>>
>> wolfgang
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120816/37603b04/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t