[governance] India's communications minister - root server misunderstanding (still...)

[Riaz K Tayob]

no reason why a process solution cannot include this as an agenda... 
especially if evolutionary change is the means adopted to ensure 
stability as well as political legitimacy...

Maggie Thatcher once said, TINA - there is no alternative. Many in the 
South said TAHA - there are hundreds of alternatives... time to 
decolonise the evolutionary imagination perhaps?

India, Brazil etc have resources if they need to assign it to functions 
essential to sovereignty... if they make a proposal, then perhaps they 
have an idea what it entails... it would not do to go around asking for 
capabilities if the general political mood is that this will never 
happen...

as a separate matter, perhaps to the lurkers on this list..

is it not amazing how people who raise CIR legitimacy issues have to 
deal with double standards (perhaps I am not the only reactionary on 
this list)... why not ask why is the status quo legitimate? One need not 
buy into Parminder's position but to force him into a corner like this 
and then to complain about tenor is simply ridiculous... perhaps your 
arguments will be more convincing if more of you all gang up on him?

On 2012/08/10 03:09 PM, McTim wrote:
> or ignoring folk who ask questions like "have you asked the people who 
> you have proposed to take over rootserver functions if they want 
> to/can do/have the money to do that ?"


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t