DRAFT: PLEASE COMMENT JOVAN/VLADA Re: [governance] May consultation: IGC input RP and access

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<CAMz5XN6UmOe4X3U-DNTJsSnURUqu0p47G0-xWGKf8H=xfWm80Q at mail.gmail.com>, at 
08:24:44 on Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Deirdre Williams 
<williams.deirdre at gmail.com> writes
>I also think that we should look at RP the other way round too. 
>Currently it isn't possible to make not being physically present the 
>same as being physically present. Therefore we at least should be clear 
>about what are MUST HAVES and what may come later.
>
>Also I think it is vital NOT TO conflate RP with access for people with 
>disabilities. They are both separate and important issues, and both of 
>them deserve individual attention

My point is that the same solution is equally useful to either 
community. I wasn't making a judgement about which community
"deserved" the solution more than the other.
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t