[governance] New MAG announced

[Roland Perry]

In message <4F9AC1B6.8070106 at eff.org>, at 17:56:38 on Fri, 27 Apr 2012, 
Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org> writes
>>> Well blogging takes more time than reporting to the list...
>>
>> Going to the event takes three or four days for most people. Isn't it 
>>worth spending a few hours telling your stakeholders what the outcome 
>>was?
>Reporting is fine. However, you do need everyone to report the same 
>thing..

If everyone reports the same thing, why send multiple people to the 
meeting? Surely each will bring their own perspective to both the input 
and the feedback.

>You can also... but a joint report is much better.

I disagree, the overhead of agreeing such a report would delay it 
enormously.

>Usually, you do so in other processes.  Also I said that because there 
>might be people from civil society who might not be in the list or at 
>least I havent read an email from them).

This goes back to the question of whether the Civil Society members of 
the MAG are representative of [only] the IGC, or of a wider Civil 
Society movement. As far as I can see, only three of the seven IGC 
nominees were selected, so perhaps there's "life outside the IGC" as 
well?
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t