[governance] New MAG announced

[Roland Perry]

In message <4F9ABC14.10108 at eff.org>, at 17:32:36 on Fri, 27 Apr 2012, 
Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org> writes
>Well blogging takes more time than reporting to the list...

Going to the event takes three or four days for most people. Isn't it 
worth spending a few hours telling your stakeholders what the outcome 
was?

>Some civil society reps are not even in this list so they will report 
>to their members or what they consider is their stakeholder group.
>
>Some consider the IGC as their stakeholder group for reporting back, 
>especially those who are selected by IGC. Some others, might report to 
>their own members, I guess.
>
>I think that even those not selected by IGC but are in the list would 
>like to share more sensitive issues but have concerns about the 
>openness of the list.
>
>So if IGC does not have a strong structure for civil participation 
>only, then, maybe everything should become public? Again: I do not have 
>an answer.

The civil society stakeholder group has some unique challenges, but 
maybe after all this time (7th year now) it's time to start addressing 
them.

Other stakeholder groups... what to they do. For example do Government 
members report back to just their own government, to all governments, a 
subset of governments, no-one at all. Anyone know?
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t