SV: [governance] regulating global digital monopolies
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Sat Sep 24 06:07:01 EDT 2011
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:38 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>wrote:
> **
>
>
> In case of most social, economic, cultural norms and laws, these mega
> digital businesses generally play in a lawless field
>
all evidence points to the contrary of this rhetorical flourish.
> You read the long discussion a few weeks back on this list on how when
> asked to implement a consumer law by Taipei government, Google instead chose
> to withdraw the availability of Android market. This with the kind of market
> power (a very inadequate term with regard to the level of power that is
> involved here) that google has, can in effect be a blackmail.
>
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blackmail
By the definition of blackmail, it's the Taiwanese municipal authorities who
are guilty of it!
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110924/7eadbb10/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list