[governance] Re: Registrar-Registry integration and conflicts of interest

[CW Mail]

1.	Most regulatory agencies have or should have temporary restrictions  
on the future activities of their officials with respect to the  
regulated industries concerned.

2.	Definitely. See my comments from August 2010:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/vi-pdp-initial-report/pdfe3itOHmj9w.pdf

CW


On 22 Sep 2011, at 14:58, McTim wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, CW Mail  
> <mail at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
>> Well, many of us have been subject to "cooling off" periods.
>
> can you be more specific?
>
>>
>> In this particular case, the issue arises because ICANN has wrongly  
>> decided
>> that Registrars may apply to become their own Registries.
>
>
> What is that to do with this case?
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110922/7416baee/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t